beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.11.21 2014고단1342

마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendants are not authorized to handle narcotics.

1. Smoking marijuana;

A. Defendants B, B, and E committed a crime on September 2013, 2013, at the H vehicles owned by Defendant B, which were parked on the street in front of the Gmaart located in the Seocho-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and smoked in a way of inhaleing the smoke by attaching 0.5g of marijuana, which was possessed by Defendant B by an influorous method.

B. Defendant A, and E, committed the crime of Defendant A and E, together with I, smoked in the following manners: (a) around September 2014, at E’s house located in the Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (b) around September 201, the 0.5g of marijuana, which I possessed in a non-fluencing manner: (c) tobacco paper with a f

C. Defendant A’s criminal act 1) around July 2014, at the E’s house located in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Yong-gu, Yong-gu, Yong-gu, YA, Defendant A smoked 0.5g of marijuana, which I had been in possession of influence, on a tobacco paper, and then inhales it by attaching a fluence. (2) Defendant A smoked around October 9, 2014 at around 01:0, and around 105, the 0.5g g of marijuana received from I in the Ma of the Defendant A’s vehicle located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu L 105 parking lot. D.

Defendant

B A around 08:00 on October 7, 2014, Defendant B smoked 0.5g of marijuana, which was in possession of an influence in the fruit n located in Asan-si, Asan-si, in a way of inhaleing the smoke by attaching a fluence on the paper of tobacco.

2. The Defendant A received marijuana remaining after smoking as set forth in No. 1(b) around September 2014 from I, and from around that time, Defendant A kept and possessed 0.8 grams in the Defendant’s vehicle from around October 10 of the same year to around October 10 of the same year.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The application of statutes to each appraisal report;

1. Article 61 (1) 4 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc. under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts;