손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the request for the appraisal of the medical records to the Director A (including the branch numbers) and the Director D Hospital of this Court.
The defendant is an intention to operate the hospital with a mutual painology and medicine (hereinafter referred to as the “instant hospital”) called “F Councilor”).
나. 원고는 2013. 1. 24. 발목 통증을 호소하며 이 사건 병원에 내원하였고, 피고는 삐끗하여 발생한 좌측 발목의 통증과 부기로서 발목 염좌와 아킬레스 건염의 소견으로 원고의 발목 주변에 주사치료(이하 ‘이 사건 치료’라고 한다)를 시행하였다.
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion
A. At the time of the instant treatment, the Defendant asserted the Plaintiff’s assertion that the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the left side of the son, despite the continuous detention of the Plaintiff at the time of the instant treatment, has reached the knife, and due to that, the Plaintiff suffered serious pains even after the treatment of injury, such as the lower part of the upper part of the front part of the fnife, the front part of the flife, the front part of the flife, the front part of the flife
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for damages of KRW 30,00,000 in total, including the above injury treatment costs of KRW 2,96,199 and solatium KRW 27,003,80.
B. In light of the foregoing, the head of the D Hospital’s appraisal presented an opinion to the effect that “the Plaintiff’s left-hand bombed bombs, stokes, and stokes, which were likely to have already occurred before the instant treatment; there is no possibility of the instant treatment using injection; and that it was appropriate to conduct injection treatment to the patient complaining of the bombs.” In light of the foregoing, other evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone, which led to the Plaintiff’s assertion.