The reasons stated in this part are as follows, except as follows, the reasoning of this Court is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: (b) “1. Basic Facts” (from 9 to 7.8 degrees), and therefore, (c).

The 5th page "14,752,040,00 won" shall be added to "14,752,040,800 won" for the last 14,752,040,80 won.

The 6th 7th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th "the plaintiff was " to 8th ," and "B , as follows:

On March 22, 2018, the Plaintiff presented two proposals to the Defendant, along with an explanation of the current status of the field situation, and requested the Defendant to submit the results thereof. The first proposal “whether the Plaintiff may waive the instant facility project without a claim for contract deposit, after settling the amount invested separately by the Plaintiff in addition to the progress payment, from approximately KRW 789,000,000,000 (excluding value added tax) for the remainder design amount,” and the second proposal “whether it is possible to additionally provide approximately KRW 2,00,000,000 necessary for the completion of the construction separately from the remainder design change amount.”

The reasoning of the lower court’s judgment on the Defendant’s main defense of safety is as follows, and the reasoning of the lower court’s judgment on the Defendant’s main defense of safety is as follows: “3. The judgment on the Defendant’s main defense of safety (from 8.3 to 9.10)” (see, e.g., the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act).

8. The 20th 20th son shall be the "Plaintiff and subcontractor H".

9. From 6.0 to 8.0 ...................................

In light of the fact that the provision of a civil or criminal objection to the agreement of this case is subject to the terms of the contract at the time of the above agreement, and it cannot be deemed that it applies to disputes concerning the modified contents in the event that the contents of the contract are modified thereafter, the above provision merely provides that H does not raise an objection to the settlement while he withdraws from the joint supply and demand company.