beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.03.23 2016나60762

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. As to the real estate in this case, the plaintiff filed a partition of co-owned property by the method of in-kind division as the principal lawsuit. The defendant filed a partition of co-owned property by the method of auction division as the counterclaim. The court of first instance rejected the defendant's counterclaim, and ordered the division of co-owned property in kind based on the price compensation. On this issue, the plaintiff and the defendant appealed both, and the defendant withdrawn the appeal, the object of judgment in this court is limited to the part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the first instance court

2. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. In conclusion, the decision of the first instance court is just and reasonable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.