However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around May 30, 2012, the Defendant altered private documents: (a) at the office D office in Ansan-si, a member C, a copy of the test report in the name of the president of the Korea Living Environment Examination and Research Institute in the name of the head of the company's quality management team in Ansan-si, the company at the office D office in charge of the company's quality management team; and (b) stored on the screen a copy of the test report in the name of the president of the Korea Living Environment Examination and Research Institute in the name of the company; and (c) revised the “18m E0 PB in the contents of the report by using a computer to “23m, 28m E0m, 14m, 2010”; and (d) “the date of receipt on April 10, 2012” in the lower part of the date of the examination to “the date on April 27, 2012” and “the date on April 27, 2010,” respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant altered one copy of the test report in the name of the president of the Korea Living Environment Examination and Research Institute, which is a private document of certification of facts.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, sent the altered report to F, who is unaware of the fact of the alteration, by facsimile, after receiving the demand from F, an employee of E, a stock company, to send the report of the refash that was supplied by F, the company E, and used the altered report to F, as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part G and F of the suspect examination protocol against the defendant

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of statutes to test results or test results ( April 27, 2010);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime is not good in that the defendant alters and uses a test report certifying the quality of the supplied materials for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order;

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case.