1. Fraud;

A. On June 5, 2012, the Defendant sold 2,80 square meters of forests and fields in the city of women owned by his mother, to the injured party B in front of the Nonghyup Bank in the central Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Sung-gu. (hereinafter “Seoul-gu”) around June 5, 2012.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any specific property as well as the debt of approximately KRW 200 million at the time, and there was no intention or ability to return money to the victim because he thought that he would repay other personal debt with the money received from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 6 million in cash from the victim, and transferred KRW 5.7 million through the company bank account under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 5.7 million from around that time to August 13, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes, was remitted to KRW 8,290,000 via 11 times in total as shown in the list of crimes.

B. On September 5, 2013, the Defendant would sell the victim C with approximately 250 million forest land owned by the mother at around 2,800 forest land in the city of her own, in front of the Japanese market where the Mademic Mademic Mademic Mademic Mademic Mademic Mademic Mademic Y

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return money to the victim on the grounds of paragraph 1-A.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 20 million from the victim around September 6, 2013.

2. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant received a request from the victim C’s house located in Seongbuk-gu, Sung-nam City, to request the victim to repay KRW 15 million of loans under the name of the Defendant, in which the victim was the guarantor.

The Defendant received transfer of KRW 15 million from the victim of the same day through the bank account in the name of the Defendant, and used the money arbitrarily for repayment of other personal debt, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against B and C 1.