beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.11.14 2014구합10769

사단법인 정관변경허가거부처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 29, 2008, the Plaintiff obtained permission for establishment from the Defendant on April 29, 2008 for the purpose of installing autonomous fire-fighting systems and safety facilities and promoting public relations activities in fire-fighting safety, with the business owner, etc. of places of business using many unspecified persons, including restaurants, film theaters, and singing practice rooms

5. 23. A non-profit incorporated association that has completed the registration of incorporation.

Article 1 (Name) of the proposed amendment of the current provision shall be referred to as the “Korea Fire Safety Association of Incorporated Association” (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Fire Safety Association”).

This corporation shall be referred to as the “Korea Fire Safety Management Association of an incorporated association” (hereinafter referred to as the “main association”).

Article 4 (Projects) In order to achieve the purpose of Article 3, the main session shall carry out the following projects:

1. Autonomous fire-fighting management publicity of publicly-used establishments;

2. Technical research and development necessary for the appropriate fire-fighting safety of publicly-used establishments;

3. Establishment and management of an information system for fire safety in publicly-used establishments;

4. Service activities of the civil petition counseling office for fire safety control of publicly-used establishments;

5. Other projects delegated or approved by the competent authorities.

6. In order to achieve the purpose of Article 3, the main body of the related projects incidental to the above subparagraphs shall carry out the following projects:

1. Safety education for the fire-fighting of publicly used establishments;

2. Installation, management, maintenance, and inspection guidance of fire-fighting systems of publicly-used establishments;

3. Safety management of fire prevention in publicly-used establishments;

4. Counseling on civil petitions for fire-fighting in publicly-used establishments;

5. Other projects delegated or approved by the competent authorities or projects incidental to any of the subparagraphs above.

B. On May 17, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for the amendment of the articles of incorporation to the Defendant with the following content:

C. On May 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) required registration of fire-fighting system business pursuant to relevant statutes; (b) was permitted to exclude the Plaintiff from the purpose of business; and (c) was denied the Plaintiff’s application for change of the articles of incorporation on the ground that the Plaintiff’s construction and inspection

(hereinafter “instant disposition”).