Address

Reference domicile

Attorney Park Jae-hoon

2. Address;

Reference domicile

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

The facts that the plaintiff and the defendant filed a marriage report on December 22, 1989 with two married children who have attained majority between them are recognized by the entries of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

Considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the respective statements and images of Gap 6, 7, 8, 9, 3, 4, and 6, and by the overall purport of the reports and arguments by family investigation officers, the marriage relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant is impossible to recover because the marriage relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant has already ceased, and this constitutes a judicial divorce ground under Article 840 subparagraph 6 of the Civil Act.

During the marriage period, the Plaintiff and the Defendant experienced conflicts due to economic difficulties of the Defendant’s business failure. The Plaintiff suffered suffering from the Plaintiff due to verbal abuse, property damage, etc. caused by the Defendant’s dives nature of the Defendant’s diversity and the diversous nature, and the diversous nature thereof. At around 01:0 on October 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) had a dispute with the Plaintiff, while she had a dispute with the Plaintiff, brought a knife in the kitchen; and (b) had a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k.

There is a view that conflict or confusion between families is due to the Plaintiff’s religion. Although one year has passed since the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for this case, the Plaintiff continues to have been divorced, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant only have their own position, and do not make any effort for the recovery of marriage.

3. Conclusion

If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified.