If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On February 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 07:15, the Defendant did not open the victim D’s gate from the front corridor No. 612 of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Office Officetel No. 612, the Defendant discarded the bamboo.

year, as shown in the table.

(1) No governance can be re-satisfind.

The 612 studio 612, which is so sound that the market price of the victim is unknown, was damaged by the noise of the vehicle by walking the studio 612.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of causing property damage and the choice of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. At around 09:00 on February 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim, who was living together in the front of the victim D’s 612 of the Ildong-dong Office C Officetel 612 (Inn, 38 years of age), had reported the Defendant to the police by means of the damage of property before this mold; and (b) reported the Defendant’s death to the police; and (c) reported the death to the police police station, “I will die. I will die, and die. I will die.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim D expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the Defendant on April 18, 2013, after the institution of the instant prosecution. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.