If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 15:50 on January 7, 2013, the Defendant expressed that “A victim C, who is confined in the same ward, was able to live in a solitary area, she shall live in a solitary area, she shall live in an appeal, and she shall live in an appeal from home,” and that C, who was a small customer located on the floor of the ward, was able to return to the victim, etc. on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim C, who was confined in the same ward.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim's injury such as dump, tension, etc. in the inception of treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of medical treatment of prisoners;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines (in the event of a detention house again leading to the crime of this case, considering the fact that the damage is insignificant, reflectiveness

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;