If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 18:00 on September 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) moved the victim’s vehicle parked in front of the rear F to another place in the Econstruction office in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, to the other place; (b) however, the victim, “A” and the end of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the back of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (investigative records 94 pages);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant and his/her defense counsel had no fact at the time of the victim and some physical contacts.

Even if this means that the act of this case constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act because it had shown the attitude of the victim as the victim seems to be at the time of the defendant's booming.

However, according to the records of this case, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion cannot be accepted, since the defendant's act of this case is an act to protect the present unfair infringement and constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act with considerable reasons, in full view of the background of this case, the situation before and after this case, the method and method of crime, and the parts and extent of the defendant and the victim, etc.