Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of HJ125T-16D.

At around 15:00 on August 3, 2020, the Defendant driven the above Oba, and led to the cross-section 87 in the Daegu-dong-ro, Daegu-gu, to the C building from the breadth.

At this point, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed in the front bank, so it is necessary to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving service and to properly check the front bank, and there was a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop the vehicle, but is in fact in violation of the signal.

The front portion of the E QM3 car driven by the victim D, who was in parallel with the three-lanes from the TG side of the QMG, was the front part of the defendant's territory.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a scarcity of a scarke, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the site photograph of the accident, the actual condition survey report, the statement of the traffic accident situation, the written statement, the written statement, the written request for investigation cooperation (request for confirmation, such as a signal system), the written request for investigation cooperation, the statement of the signal presentation system lower than the signal presentation system, the results of the investigation of the signal presentation system, the detailed statement of the 112 reported case processing, the medical certificate, the investigation report (whether a suspect signal has been violated), the photograph of the

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;