A. The ground for liability 1) Plaintiff A was employed as an on-site employee of the Defendant Company on February 6, 2017. (2) On July 13, 2017, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as a chest dystroke, streke, streke, streke, etc., while the Defendant Company located at around July 13, 2017, performed the installation work of solar power generators on the roof of the asbestos slate set up by the Defendant Company E at the site of the F work site construction work performed by the Defendant Company located at around July 11:0.

(3) Although the instant accident was at a risk of falling, the Defendant Company did not at all install safety railing or falling prevention equipment, etc., and at the time of the instant work instruction, the Plaintiff Company did not provide personal safety equipment to the Plaintiff A at the time of the instant work instruction. (4) Plaintiff B and the Plaintiff C are the Plaintiff’s parents.

5) Thus, the defendant company is liable for all damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the user of the plaintiff A. B. The defendant's liability is 65% (the plaintiff A did not require the defendant to take such safety measures as above for the prevention of the fall risk, and the plaintiff A did not secure its own safety) of the defendant's liability. The defendant company's liability is hard to recognize that the plaintiff neglected the defendant's instruction to use the bridge installed at the accident of this case and went down immediately from the steel structure above the roof of the stable. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap's 1,3,5,5,6,7,8,14, and the purport of the whole arguments and arguments.

2. A period for calculating the scope of compensation for damage shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but a period of less than a month and less than a won shall be discarded;

The calculation of the present price at the time of the accident of this case shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and the following among the parties' arguments: