사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On May 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Ulsan District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 3, 2016.
【Criminal Facts】
On January 1, 2016, when the defendant demanded C to prepare a notarial deed in the name of D, which was owned by the defendant's wife, with a demand to repay debts of KRW 40 million as well as a demand to pay debts, the defendant had forged a notarial deed in the name of D with a certificate of personal seal impression and a certificate of personal seal impression in the name of D held by the defendant, and used it to prepare a notarial deed in which D is the debtor using it.
1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;
A. On January 8, 2016, the Defendant stated D’s name in the debtor column of the power form “D,” in the letter of proxy form, “amount borrowed,” and “58,800,000 won” in the letter of proxy form, and marked D’s name in the delegating column, and affixed D’s seal impression.
For the purpose of exercising this, the Defendant forged a letter of proxy in the name of D, a private document regarding rights and obligations.
B. The Defendant submitted to the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication a letter of delegation in the same location as the above paragraph (a) and exercised it, as if it had been duly formed, at the same time and time, as in the above paragraph (a).
2. False entry in the original notarial deed, and uttering of the original notarial deed;
A. The Defendant: (a) temporarily and at the same time and at the same place as Paragraph (a) of Article 1, the Defendant submitted a forged power of attorney-at-law to the said attorney-at-law in charge of authentication, as prescribed in Paragraph (b), although the said D did not borrow money from the said Section; and (b) borrowed KRW 58,800,000 on the Notarial Deed, the original copy of the Notarial Deed.