2. Determination: (a) although there were no circumstances to consider the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant was the motive for the instant crime; (b) the Defendant was late and late due to his mistake; (c) the number of the instant crimes exceeds three times; (d) the Defendant’s family relationship and environment; and (e) the Defendant’s nature was not good in light of the Defendant’s Criminal Procedure Act; (c) the Defendant was punished twice for the same kind of crime; and (d) on November 26, 2015, the Seoul East Eastern District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor for night intrusion larceny at the Seoul East East District Court on April 17, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence; and (d) the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims up to the trial, the sentence of this case cannot be deemed to be unduly unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.