제3자이의
1. The defendant's case concerning the price for goods 2017Gau3125 decided Gwangju District Court's Mayang-si court's Mayang-si case as to B.
1. The Defendant’s basic facts are without dispute between the parties or acknowledged by the respective statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5, based on the authentic copy of the Gwangju District Court Decision 2017Gau3125, Gwangju District Court Decision 2017Gau3125, which issued a recommendation for reconciliation with executory power in the case of goods purchase-price case.
2. As the Plaintiff asserts that the items listed in the separate sheet are owned by himself, the Plaintiff, the owner of the items listed in the separate sheet, shall lease them to B on November 15, 2012, and two million won each monthly rent from the Defendant around that time, taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings, as a whole, since the Plaintiff alleged in the separate sheet Nos. 2 and 3 as its own ownership. However, the Plaintiff did not receive part of the monthly rent from the Defendant.
may be recognized that the payment has been made.
Therefore, since the articles listed in the attached list are owned by the plaintiff, compulsory execution against the third party's property that is not the debtor B is illegal.
3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.