A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months, by imprisonment for defendant C, by eight months, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

Defendant

A On January 6, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. and sentenced two years of probation, etc. on January 14, 2012. On November 30, 2012, the judgment became final and conclusive on January 23, 2013, which was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents, etc. by the same court. On October 5, 2012, the judgment became final and conclusive on April 9, 2013.

Defendant

B was sentenced to six years of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents at the Seoul Southern District Court on December 14, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 28, 2013. On October 5, 2012, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the crime of offering a bribe and became final and conclusive on April 13, 2013.

Defendant

C On November 30, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 8, 2012.

Defendant

A is a person working as the chief of the headquarters at an I Hospital located in H from around April 1999 to April 2008, and Defendant B is an industrial accident insurance fraud hub in which a certain amount of money is collected from a person subject to the Industrial Accident Insurance Co., Ltd. in the manner of applying for the industrial accident insurance money by pretending the false industrial accident accident.

1. From around 2005, Defendants A and B had been involved in the industrial accident insurance fraud, and had the co-offenders of the insurance fraud and the neighbors or the people who received the request from the president of the I Hospital, forged a disability diagnosis certificate under the name of the J of the I Hospital and submitted it to the Dong Office to register them with the disabled unlawfully. Defendant A, even though the disabled requester had not received a disability diagnosis from the doctor J of the above hospital, was in fact forged a disability diagnosis certificate using the name plates and the official seal, etc. kept at the hospital, and Defendant B recruited the disabled, and substituted the disabled person’s application for registration.