2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The plaintiff is the representative director of B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "B") running the transportation business.

B. As a result of the on-site verification of B, the head of the Dong-gu District Tax Office: (a) reported the Plaintiff’s total amount of KRW 23,803,800 on January 1, 2010; (b) 23,803,800; (c) 16,652,639; (d) 21,420,000; (b) 17,509,000; (c) 27,750,000; (d) 27,750,000; and (d) 38,942,530; (d) 23,50,000; (e) 38,942,530; and (e) 36,50,000; (e) 16,000; and (e) 939,209 or less of global income in 2013.

C. Accordingly, on May 1, 2015, the head of the competent tax office imposed on the Plaintiff a value-added tax of 1,349,860 won, value-added tax of 2,2010 for the second term of 2,010, value-added tax of 1,157,510 won, value-added tax of 1,41,441,650 won, value-added tax of 2,201 for the second term of 2, 2011, value-added tax of 1,140,180 won, value-added tax of 1,745,800 won, value-added tax of 2,463,850 won, value-added tax of 1,2013, value-added tax of 86,80 won for the second term of 2014, global income tax of 205, 2015, 2015, 3605, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as "disposition in this case"). 【No dispute exists, entry in Gap's Evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, and Eul Evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff is a physically disabled person 1 and has been selected as a basic recipient, and has not been able to pay taxes according to the disposition of this case since he was unable to perform his economic activities since he was selected as a basic recipient, so the disposition of this case in this case shall be revoked