When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates a revolving store in the fish market B.

Around 21:30 on September 17, 2014, the Defendant was driving a D-to-hurd vehicle owned by the Defendant by the Dong-to-hurd vehicle of the Defendant, C (E-hurd 42 years old), the damaged vehicle, while driving the D-to-hurd vehicle of the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the name of the Defendant, who did not apply to the above insurance without a license, had the Defendant pay the insurance money to the above damaged vehicle repair expenses and the victims for the insurance money under the name of the Defendant, with an opportunity to buy the Samsung Fire Integrated Insurance Co., Ltd., and had the Defendant receive pecuniary benefits. On the same day, at around 22:10 on the same day, the Defendant was driving in the name of the said insurer to employees

The insurance was received by deceiving as if the accident was paid.

Therefore, from the end of September 2014, the above Samsung Fire Safety Compensation Team acquired the amount of money equivalent to KRW 35,726,890 in the name of repair cost of the E-friendly vehicle, KRW 3,753,570 in the name of the above driver of the vehicle, KRW 3,121,340 in the name of the Fluent vehicle repair cost, KRW 3,121,340 in the name of the Fluent vehicle repair cost, and KRW 3,68,630 in the name of the above Dluent vehicle repair cost, and KRW 46,290,430 in the name of the said Dluent vehicle repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The report on the receipt of an accident, the contract sheet, and the integrated inquiry into the receipt of an accident (including the current status of payment of insurance proceeds);

1. Current status of payment of insurance proceeds;

1. Vehicles, photographs, details of repairs of vehicles and other documents;

1. Application of the aforementioned Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written transfer, a report on actual situation investigation, and a report on investigation results;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.