2. In relation to the crime of injury by robbery in this case, the defendant planned the crime in advance at the time and possessed excessive amounts, and took over various parts of the body, including the face of the victim, against the neighbors living in front of the elevator living in front of the apartment in front of the elevator living in front of the above elevator at the night, and taken off money and valuables, is a crime that seriously threatens the safety of society, and the nature of the crime is very poor and high, and the damage of the victim is not completely recovered until now, and the circumstances after the crime are also not good.

In addition, the Defendant committed the theft crime of this case continuously without being aware of the injury after the robbery crime of this case, and repeatedly committed several larceny crimes. Each of the larceny crimes of this case also committed during the period of repeated crimes for which it has not yet passed since each of the larceny crimes of this case was committed. Thus, the Defendant continued to deviate from norms and threaten social safety.

There is no attempt to avoid a reasonable criminal punishment against a defendant who is in bad quality and circumstances.

Even before the crime of robbery injury by robbery in this case was committed, there is no particular criminal history against the defendant, and there is room to boom the defendant to commit the remaining crimes that are difficult, and in particular, the circumstances that should consider equity with the case of larceny, etc. of the criminal judgment against the defendant finalized on February 16, 2012, should be taken into account, such as the circumstance that the above robbery injury by robbery in this case should be judged together with the criminal judgment against the defendant.

Even if the court below's punishment against the defendant is reasonable and acceptable, and it can be said that it is too unreasonable as the defendant alleged otherwise.