2. Although there are no circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the confession of each of the crimes of this case and the fact that a part of damage was temporarily returned and the damage was recovered, the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime. However, on December 16, 2011, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and a fine of 300,000 won by larceny, etc. at the Changwon District Court on August 2, 2012, and was sentenced to punishment of the same kind of crime on August 2, 2012, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he was in the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence was completed, and it seems that he did not reach the agreement with the victims, and that he did not make any effort to recover damage, balance in sentencing with other similar cases, and the defendant's age, character and character, intelligence and environment, motive and circumstance of each of the crimes of this case, and all the sentencing conditions of this case after the crime are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.