손실보상금
1. The Defendant: 30,606,400 won to Plaintiff A; 29,729,000 won to Plaintiff B; 54,059,400 won to Plaintiff C; and 95.
1. Details of ruling;
A. The Plaintiffs are the owners of each land indicated in the “land subject to accommodation” in the attached Table [Attachment 1] (hereinafter “each land of this case”; and when individually named each land, the Plaintiffs are the owners of each land of this case according to the sequences.
B. Business Approval and Public Notice - H 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as the “1st and 2nd and 2nd and each of the above projects shall be referred to as the “1st and 2nd and 3th and all of them shall be referred to as the “the instant projects.”
[Public Notice] - The Gyeonggi-do Public Notice J on December 5, 2013, and the Gyeonggi-do Public Notice J on May 29, 2014 - The defendant
C. Each expropriation ruling (hereinafter “each expropriation ruling”) rendered on December 23, 2014 by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal (hereinafter “each expropriation ruling”) 1) - The first project (the Plaintiff A, C, D, E) of this case - Land subject to compensation: The amount indicated in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 through 11: Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the amount indicated in the [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 through 11. - The commencement date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on February 6, 2015 - The second project (Plaintiff F) of this case: Gan appraisal corporation: Gan appraisal corporation, Inc. and two appraisal corporations, Inc.) - The second project subject to compensation: The land subject to compensation: The amount indicated in the column for “land expropriation adjudication” in attached Form 12, 13: [Attachment 1] No. 12 and 13.
- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and a Pacific appraisal corporation for a corporation on February 6, 2015;
C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered each objection on June 25, 2015 (hereinafter “each objection”) - The content of the adjudication: The compensation for losses for each land of this case was modified as indicated in the attached Table 1.
- An appraisal corporation 1) The primary business of this case: An appraisal corporation at sight and a joint appraisal corporation 2) The second business of this case: An appraisal corporation at Alban and an appraisal corporation at one appraisal corporation
D. The result of this Court’s entrustment to K of appraiser of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - Contents of appraisal: attached Table 2.