However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BP car.

On November 29, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 63 km from the right edge to the right edge of the mountain road at the speed of 63 km per hour from the right edge of the road at two weeks.

Since there is a center line in the yellow-line, which is a children protection zone with a speed of 30 km per hour, and the center line of yellow-line is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly keep the front-way, keep the car lines, and safely drive the motor vehicle in order to prevent the accident in advance by reducing the speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and her negligent driving at a speed of 63 km at a speed of 63km and turned off from the hubway, and was driven by the victim D (ma, 44 years old) driving at the opposite lane due to the negligent negligence of the central line, and received the front part of the cargo vehicle in front of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, at around 12:40 on the same day, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (n, 81 years of age) who was a passenger of the said passenger car due to the foregoing occupational negligence, at the H hospital located G at the Government-si, resulting in the death of the victim due to multiple long-term depression, and at the same time, the victim D (Nam, 44 years of age), who requires approximately eight weeks of care.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the investigation report (case concerning the circumstances of the accident) on the investigation report by the defendant's written statement of his/her legal statement D, the inspection report on the actual condition of his/her statement, the inspection report on the site photograph, the medical certificate of his/her degree of death (F), and the

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 and 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment without prison labor for the selection of a punishment under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the case.