beta
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.11.24 2016가단13897

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the description of evidence No. 2 and evidence No. 3-1 through No. 6 of the evidence No. 3, the Plaintiff is operating a bath with the trade name of “D” (hereinafter “instant bath”). On January 26, 2016, the Plaintiff, while using the bath of this case on January 26, 2016, may recognize the fact that he was injured (hereinafter “the injury of this case”).

The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff suffered the injury of this case due to the floor of the bath of this case, which seems to be sleeping, due to the plaintiff's knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-

The written evidence Nos. 1 and 2 alone seems that the floor of the bath of this case seems to be sleeping off the stalth of the bath of this case.

It is not sufficient to recognize that he/she was not equipped with safety requirements, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is without merit, and it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.