A. The Plaintiffs entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant as shown in the attached Table 1 insurance contract.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant insurance contract”). B.

① On May 4, 2016, Plaintiff A was diagnosed as A’s malicious life (C73), head ice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice fice frankings (C77), and was diagnosed as Party B’s malicious life (C73), C’s fice fice frankings (C77), C’s fice fice 2’s fice fice fice fice frankings (C77), and was diagnosed as Party B’s fice fice fice 7’s fice fice fice fice 7’s fice fice fice fice fice fice fice frankings, and C’s fice fice fice fice fice fice 7’s fice fice fice 77.

C. The content of the instant insurance contract is as shown in the attached terms and conditions.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 12 (including provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs asserted that they received diagnosis of the difference between head ice and forest cream Section, and that they constitute general cancer stipulated in the terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case. Thus, the defendant asserts that they should pay general cancer diagnosis expenses stipulated in the insurance contract of this case to the plaintiffs.

As to this, the defendant is diagnosed by the plaintiffs, the difference between the head fice and the flag of the forest and the malicious life (C77) of which detailed is unknown.