When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a driver of B 4.5 tons of modern 4.5 tons truck owned by himself.

Trucks operating on roads shall pass through the lanes or places where the loading capacity measuring equipment is installed in order to measure the loading capacity.

Nevertheless, on July 26, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the measurement of the loading quantity of the cargo by driving the said truck on the part of the Bridge, which is located in the documents of the U.S. A., the U.S., the U.S., at around 13:22, in order to prevent the Defendant from measuring the loading quantity of the cargo by passing through the general cargo lane without passing through the package, and by passing through the air, the cargo dedicated to the cargo vehicle equipped with measuring devices for the loading volume without passing through the package, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from the time of the foregoing day to November 13:32, 2016, in total, 55 times from Nov. 13:32, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Materials evidencing vehicles violating restrictions on operation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to violated computerized data;

1. Article 115 subparagraph 5 of the Act and Article 78 (3) of the Act of each of the roads where the relevant Act and the punishment are selected for crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;