준강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (limited to imprisonment for eight months, two years of probation, 40 hours of lecture attendance order, 80 hours of community service order, 3 years of employment restriction order) that the court below sentenced is too unreasonable.
2. The crime of this case is not very good because the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who was under the influence of alcohol and was aware of the victim's trust in the relationship between elementary school teachers and students.
In this case, the victim seems to have suffered a considerable mental impulse.
In light of the aforementioned circumstances, even if the Defendant fully acknowledges the instant crime and the victim agreed with the victim, and the Defendant does not want the punishment of the Defendant before the instant case, the Defendant is a primary offender with no criminal power, and the instant crime appears not to be planned by contingent impulses, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable on the ground that the sentence imposed by the Defendant for the reasons indicated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.