beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.02.17 2016고단2

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act. On December 12, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment of 5 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Seog branch branch of the Daegu District Court on December 12, 2008. On January 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment of 6 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the resident support of the Daegu District Court on January 24, 201

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM7 car.

On September 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol 0.158% while driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol at a 0.158% while driving the vehicle, and driving the three-lane road in front of the E-cafeteria located in Gu, Si, Gu and Si along the two-lanes from the Gu-dong boundary to the private distance distance. The Defendant changed the lane from the Gu-dong boundary to the one-lane.

At night, there was a vehicle driving in one lane, and thus, there was a duty of care to give notice of change of course to a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by operating a direction, and to give notice of change of course, and to accurately operate the steering and operating the steering system, while accurately operating the steering and operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the vehicle line to the left-hand side of the Defendant’s left-hand side, and thereby received the part of the front-hand part of the passenger car driving seat of the Defendant, which was driven by the victim F(32 years old) in the same direction from the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the injured party, such as fluoral salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the above f60,822 won of the repair cost, such as the exchange of the front fluor, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the injured party by stopping.

Summary of Evidence

1...