If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 02:23, around Busan, 2016, her flabeded the flab in the front of “Dsing room”; (b) her flab to close the door,” her flab, upon receiving a report from 112, who was called back from the Busan, Police Station E-gu, Busan, to return home from the police officer of the E District (hereinafter “F flab”); and (c) her flab, her flab, and her flabed the flab of the F F flab.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes, such as the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement on the F details;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph/cinematographic output;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of Article 51 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that there are no previous criminal records having the same kind of punishment as the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of violence is not heavy, and the relationship between family members is also maintained, and such fact is deemed to be considered as stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.