However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 1, 2019, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) expressed a large sound dispute with a person drinking alcohol and a person drinking alcohol, and (b) expressed a desire to go home from a police officer C belonging to the original police station, who received a report related to the above-mentioned 112, and called as “Ise, Ise, Ise, Ise, Ise, Ise, Ise, Ise, Is.” and (b) expressed a drinking to the above C.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including a person who has no previous conviction, previous conviction, or suspended sentence)

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;