beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.18 2012가합24050

채무부존재확인

Text

1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s obligation to the Defendants in arrears does not exist.

2. Defendant B and C’s Plaintiff

Reasons

1. Indication of basic facts;

A. On May 30, 2003, the bankrupt Gyeonggi Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Bankruptcy Co., Ltd”) was declared bankrupt by this court on May 30, 2003 (No. 2003Hahap3), and the Plaintiff is appointed as the bankruptcy trustee of the Bankruptcy Company on June 30, 2005.

The defendants are all workers of the bankruptcy company.

B. Defendant B and C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, such as wage, and received a favorable judgment on April 9, 2003 from the Sungwon District Court Branch (No. 2002Gahap5275), and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

After that, the plaintiff paid the above judgment amount to the above defendant B and C.

C. In addition, the remaining Defendants, except the above Defendants, received all overdue wages from the Plaintiff through the bus card payment, oil subsidy and company ordinaryization scheme.

2. Defendant D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, M, N, P, Q, Q, S, T, U, B,V, and W: A judgment by service by public notice (Article 308(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. Defendant X,Y, Z, AB, AD, AD, AE, AF, AH, AI, AJ, AK, AL, AM, AP, Q, AR, AV, AV, AV, AW, Az, BA, BB, BD, BE, BG, BG, BH, BG, BJ, BL, BL, BM, BM, BF, BU, BV, BV, BP, BV, BV, BP, BP, BP, BP, BY, BY, BV, BY, BY, BY, BY, BY, BY, BY, BY, CD, CD, ES, CDD, ED, ES, ES, CDD, ES, CDD, ES, CAO, ES, ES, CDD, ES, CAO, ES, CDD, ES, ES, CDD, ES, CAO, CE, CPE, C.

4. Defendant FC, FD, FE, F, F, FG, FH, FI, FJ, FJ, FJ, FK, and FL do not dispute the above Defendants, and according to this, there is no obligation to pay wages to the above Defendants. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion against the above Defendants is with merit.

5. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.