beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.05.27 2013고정2411

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 13, 2012, the Defendants conspired to forge private document forgery at the office E office of the legal office staff in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Songpa-gu, for whom he/she is aware of the circumstances, shall have E, using computers, attend the board of directors on August 13, 2012 by holding a representative director A, in-house director B, and in-house director G, etc. on August 120, 2012 and by holding a board of directors on August 13, 2012, abolish the joint representative rule and pass a resolution to dismiss H of the joint representative director.

“The minutes of the board of directors’ meeting” and “the minutes of the said company’s temporary shareholders’ meeting” were prepared in each of the following contents: “The minutes of the board of directors’ meeting and the minutes of the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting were affixed to “the minutes of the said company’s meeting” with the effect that the Franchi, Gangdong-gu Seoul, 17:20 minutes of August 13, 2012, at the office of the first floor and 120 minutes of the director’s meeting, the representative director A, inside directors B, and inside directors G were present, and the director H was removed on August 13, 2012.” Defendant A affixed the seal of the said company’s name, which was held in advance by an influenc

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge the “Minutes of the board of directors” and “Minutes of the special shareholders’ meeting” under the name of G, a private document concerning rights and duties, for the purpose of exercising.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On August 14, 2012, the Defendants submitted a list of shareholders arbitrarily prepared with the content that, in order to obtain certification with respect to the “record of directors of the board of directors” and “the minutes of temporary shareholders’ meeting” forged as above, Defendant A owns shares of 530,000 shares and 10,000 shares of Defendant B, as if they were genuinely formed with respect to the aforementioned forged “record of directors of the board of directors” and “the minutes of temporary shareholders’ meeting” to the attorneys who are not aware of the circumstances.

B. On the other hand, in order to register the removal of H’s joint representative director and internal director at the Macheon-si District Court’s Macheon-si District Court’s Macheon-si.