When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around 14:50 on February 2, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (8 years) who entered the reading room of the said library on the ground that the Defendant scam out of the library located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and scambling without any justifiable reason, on the ground that the manager of the said library gets out of the library and is bad, on the ground that the Defendant scamblings the back part of the victim E (8 years) that entered the reading room of the said library once on the floor of hand.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at around 14:51 of the same day, and around 14:51 of the same day, was accompanied by the “D Library” that is managed by the public officials F (n. 48 years of age) in Busan Shipping Daegu C, by the Defendant, on the ground that the library manager is unreasy, as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant was able to walk up one-time a sign of prohibition of entry into the area, on the ground that the library manager is going out to go outside and is bad.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the signboards which are not allowed to enter into the market at the market price used by public offices.

3. The Defendant assaulted the Defendant at the same time and place as set forth in the above paragraph 2, on the ground that the Defendant, without any reason, expressed his desire to do so to many and unspecified persons at the same time and place as set forth in the above paragraph 2, and destroyed the property, and on the ground that he said the said library manager’s f (n, 48 years of age) is said to the victim’s public official.

4. Around 14:55 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the front of the “D Library” located in Busan Shipping Daegu, the Defendant: (a) took an inquiry about the circumstances of the instant case by the Busan Shipping Station G patroler, who was called out after having received a report of assault and damage to property as mentioned in the preceding paragraph; and (b) took an inquiry of the circumstances of the instant case by H, such as “this Chewing,” and assaulted H’s cream at one time.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties for the investigation of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, F, and H;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fines) concerning the crime and the choice of punishment.