Text

The judgment below

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (based on factual errors or misapprehension of legal principles) and the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor’s evidence submitted by the prosecutor: (a) C has delegated the cancellation of the right to collateral on condition that he/she would dispose of real estate indicated in the facts charged to E and repay his/her debts; (b) as E did not dispose of the said real estate and eventually failed to repay his/her debts to C, it shall be deemed that the above delegation becomes null and void; (c) otherwise, C has not delegated or consented to the cancellation of the right to collateral; and (d) E has kept documents necessary for cancellation of the right to collateral in the court of original instance, but E has stated that it did not delegate the cancellation of the right to collateral; (b) even if two years have passed since the letter of delegation and the letter of delegation were prepared at the time of application for cancellation of the right to collateral security; (c) Defendant B requested the above registration from the prosecutor to file an application for cancellation of the right to collateral security without obtaining prior confirmation as to whether it was delegated to C, etc.; and (d) was sufficiently recognized by a certified judicial scrivener at the instant document.