beta
(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.10.13 2015누6452

국가유공자요건비해당결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 2, 1995, the Plaintiff entered the Navy and discharged him from military service on April 2, 1997.

B. On May 17, 2004, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “A person was in charge of performing an operation at an integrated hospital for water supply” on the right bridge along with the luxa fluxa in the process of washing the luxa chain, during the preparation for the winter inspection. On July 23, 2004, the review by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement recognized that “A person was in charge of providing distinguished service to the State No. 4-5” as a result of the review by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement on July 23, 2004. However, the new physical examination classified as a disability rating on November 25, 2004, re-examination on January 19, 205, re-verification on September 28, 2007, and re-verification on November 16, 2009, and was not registered as a person of distinguished service to the State.

C. On December 18, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of persons of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “the State is unable to live in the workplace due to the pain of the present Mali-gun’s pain” (hereinafter “the instant wound”) was different from the application, and applied for re-registration of persons of distinguished service to the State, on October 1996, when he/she was serving on the ground of serious pain on the ground of the Mali-ri and the bridge under his/her jurisdiction.

The "Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State" is the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State which was applied on May 23,

) Although a soldier or policeman is not a soldier or policeman wounded on duty under the former part of Article 4(1)6, the escape certificate L4-5 (after the removal of a hard disc from the U.S. hard drive), the military's performance of duties, etc. is recognized as a highly aggravated wound and thus, the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran's Compensation (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on Support

Article 2 (1) 2, which is recognized as a soldier, police officer, etc. of a person eligible for veteran's compensation under attached Table 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, shall meet subparagraph 11

“The Defendant deliberated and resolved to the effect that it is, accordingly, June 2013.