beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단1283

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and fines for ten million won, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around August 2014, the Defendants recruited female employees or other women connected to them at domestic amusement stations, and offered them with a hotel, etc. being stationed in the special-class hotel of the Makao Special Administrative Organization of the Republic of Makao (hereinafter “Makao”) of the Republic of China (hereinafter “Maka”), and offered them with compensation in return for the 6,00 red ly,00 p.m. (8 hours) or 10,000 p.m. (8 hours) in return for the 6,00 p.m. (8 hours) or the 1,400 p.m. (1,40,000,000 won for the said women’s sexual intercourse).

As the business owner of the above sexual traffic organization, Defendant A, as the head of the above sexual traffic organization, has overall control over all the affairs from the recruitment and management of the sexual traffic women, and Defendant B, as the head of Defendant A's friendship, takes charge of the affairs on behalf of him or the affairs on behalf of him when Defendant A is absent, the hotel, etc. where sexual traffic has been conducted. Defendant C, as the pet of Defendant A, provided meals to the sexual traffic women residing there at the 23th floor of Macario H apartment, and provided them as soon as possible, and Defendant D, through the Chinese language, play a role in giving interpretation to the sexual purchasing women of China or getting them to the hotel of sexual traffic.

The Defendants conspired as above on April 20, 2015 at I hotel located in Mcaro around 01:0, and received money from the Chinese male on his/her name, and had a female sexual trafficJ do sexual intercourse with the said male, as well as arranging the said female sexual traffic J, K, L, M, N, etc. to engage in sexual traffic from September 2014 to April 20, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.