If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the “C cafeteria” located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) at the “C cafeteria”); (c) the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was asked to inquire of the E officer belonging to the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the Police Station D Do; and (d) the Defendant was asked to ask the Defendant about his personal information from the E officer belonging to the police officer of

“In doing so, the part of the above E’s buckbucks was assaulted on about five occasions, and thus interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of report 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A letter of self-sufficiency in F and G;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: A crime that interferes with the functions of the State or public agencies and that is favorable to the point that the nature of the crime is the initial crime, the reflective nature, and the degree of interference with official duties is relatively minor;