2. Although the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes of this case and goes against their depth, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed while the Defendant intended to purchase a phiphone, but the Defendant issued a phiphone to another person after having attempted to purchase the phiphone and administered or smoked the phiphones and marijuana, and in light of the type, method, etc. of the crime, the criminal nature of the Defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the past having been sentenced several times as a crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., even though he had the record of having been sentenced several times due to the same crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the Defendant committed the crime of this case again during the repeated crime period, taking full account of the various circumstances, including the amount of narcotics handled by the Defendant, etc., character and behavior, environment, criminal records, family relations, etc. of the Defendant

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.