A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

It is necessary to revise and supplement part of the facts charged without following the amendment of indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the defendants' defense right.

The victim consideration business is an enterprise that enters into a contract for the collection and transportation of domestic wastes with the Gangdong-gu Office around June 201 and vicariously collects and transports domestic wastes from the Sungdong-gu, the street dong, and the village dong.

In addition, according to the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Waste Management and the above agency contract, the victim and the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Waste Management and the victim sold the standard plastic garbage bags manufactured by the Gangdong-gu office to the waste discharging business establishments, but the victim paid the cost of manufacturing and treating the plastic garbage to the Gangdong-gu office. The victim entered into a contract for food waste disposal with the restaurant, etc. which is a food waste discharging business establishment, and discharged food waste in a general container which is not a standard plastic garbage bag in a restaurant, etc., and made an agreement that 30% of the cost of collecting and transporting the food waste shall be paid to the victim on the basis of the monthly amount of food waste discharged.

The Defendants, E, and F, as employees belonging to the victim company, operated the vehicles for collection and transportation of the vehicles in F from around 201 to September 2012 by using the team with F from around 201 to around 201. Defendant A and F were in charge of collecting discharged wastes and carrying them into the vehicles driven by E, and they were in charge of collecting and transporting domestic wastes in Gangdong-gu Sungdong, etc. from around October 201 to around 201. Defendant A and E were in charge of the above duties together with Defendant A and E.

Therefore, the Defendants have discharged household wastes without permission at a business establishment that did not use standard plastic garbage bags.