However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant recruited to smoke marijuana along with smoking B, C, D, E, and F. On April 13, 2018, at the home of B located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around the new wall of April 13, 2018, the Defendant smoked it by a way that, as the Defendant smoked, fests, and smoked, one gram of hemp at the home of B located in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, as the Defendant smoked.

2. The Defendant: (a) conspiredd with C, D, E, and F to use a cocar; (b) around October 2017 to November 11, 2017, the Defendant used approximately 0.5g of Cocar A in the house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, for each other, and for cocara. (c) using approximately 0.5g of Cocar A at the house located in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul and for each other.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against C, F, or H;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure, list of narcotics appraisal records, narcotic appraisal records, and each investigation report (Attachment to B judgements or attachment to C judgements);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the calculation of an additional collection charge);

1. Article 61 (1) 4 (a) and Article 3 subparagraph 10 (a) of the Act on the Protection of Narcotics, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of smoking marijuana and the choice of imprisonment), Article 60 (1) 1, Article 3 subparagraph 1, and subparagraph 2 (c) of Article 2 of the Narcotics Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of using coaches and the choice of imprisonment) concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Protection and observation, orders to attend lectures, and orders to provide community service under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act (the purchase price of the hemp plant of 200,000 won per time); and

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one month to fifteen years;

2. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

A. The basic area that does not constitute a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics (Narcotic Drugs) (the determination of types), such as medication, simple possession, etc. (narcoticss, perfupha, etc.) [the scope of recommended punishment] (the scope of recommended punishment]: one year to three years;