A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for four months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Defendant

A, from February 1, 2014 to March 31, 2016, from February 1, 2016, A performed activities as the vice-chairperson of “G”, an affiliate of “F” in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E building. Defendant B performed activities as the said “F” from around July 2014 to July 2016.

The Defendants taken photographs of minor environmental issues, such as scattering dust, by finding the site at a national expressway or a general road, including dust dust, and Defendant A sent coverage documents to the project team (Korean road construction, etc.), which is the place where the order is placed, and directly displayed the photographs taken by the construction work entity, and displayed the photographs taken by the construction entity at the construction site, and opened money directly, as if they were to create an article of environmental issues arising from the construction site, or Defendant A sent coverage documents to the project entity and the construction entity whose order is the place where the order is placed, to remove money, or to open money from persons related to the construction site, because Defendant B would have found the environmental issues at the construction site as if the construction site would be an article of environmental issues.

1. Defendant A’s attack;

A. On March 6, 2012, the Defendant found at the construction site of the J Highway of the International Company H in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the P-si in the above company, “No. 53 has a lot of environmental problems because the warden returned to the construction site, and the contents of the complaint have been affixed by both the photo and the article has been known to him before

"........" The victim shows two photographs attached to A4 paper explaining that he or she discharged toxic substances in the treatment facilities of wastewater discharged from the construction site as he or she required to display photographs taken by the victim, and re-sleep "............."

It is necessary to see that there is no error in the field in doing so.

The phrase “the injured party” means a person who, as if he discharged a toxic substance at the facility for the discharge of wastewater in the construction site where the injured party was the head of the site, did so as to gather the toxic substance and act as if he did so as to be an article.