In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendants, D, E, F, and G are deemed to be the sectional owners of H buildings in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the victim I (the age of 44) who is the head of the building management group was unable to perform his duties as the head of the management group.

The Defendants, around 23:00 on December 13, 2013, at the general meeting of the management body of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building management body, elected a new management body, and occupied the above management body office by asserting that the period of duties of the head of the management body against the victim expired, the Defendants occupied the above management body office, and obstructed the entrance from around two meters at the same time. On December 14, 2013, at the corridor of the above management body office of the building, the victim entered the office of the management body of the building, and obstructed the defendants and D from the body so that the victims would not enter the office of the management body of the building, and E would dissat the victim “I will sell snow”, “F would d,” “F would d,” and “G would not embling the victim,” and “B would not enter the office of the management body.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D, E, F, and G to interfere with the operation of the victim's building management body by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Statement I concerning the suspect interrogation protocol concerning the defendant B;

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on provisional disposition;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion of justifiable acts by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the victim's assertion has been filed with regard to the duties of the victim's management director, and there has been disputes related to the selection of a new management director.