폭행등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In fact, the Defendant did not have committed any assault, such as harming the victim C by harming him or her, or her by putting his hand over (the point of violence), and did not interfere with or inflict any injury on the victim D by cutting the victim D’s hand hand, who is a police officer, in excess of the bottom or destroying the victim D’s hand.
(Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Injury)
The sentence of unfair sentencing (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, community service 80 hours) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts
A. On July 14, 2017, at around 22:10 on July 14, 2017, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (i) the Defendant stated in the investigative agency that the victim was assaulted by the Defendant as stated in the facts charged; (ii) the Defendant stated in the investigative agency that “the victim was fluored by fluoring the victim’s arms by hand; (iii) the victim C, who was in a de facto marital relationship, was fluored by her only her fluor and her her fluor, was her her fluored, and was her her her fluored by her her fluoring the victim’s her fluor her hand, etc.; and (iv) the lower court recognized this part of the facts charged by the Defendant as described in the facts charged.
The defendant's assertion of mistake on this point is without merit.
B. On July 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:10 on July 14, 2017, on the charge of obstruction of performance of official duties and injury; (b) around 22:10, the Defendant: (c) obstructed the assault against the above C by the slope D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo Military Police Station, who was called to the site upon the request of the above C; (d) caused the above D’s assault; (c) filled the said D’s hand to the flab; and (d) continuously pl up the left part.