On April 15, 2014, 00:0, the Defendant sought a decoration from the victim B, who is a workplace partner, and tending to do so, from the store 72, which was located at 196 o.m. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. 8

"............ as the victim was fluored, fluor’s disease was broken on the floor of the string, fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous object, and fluor’s disease was fluored, and the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the suspect interrogation protocol to the defendant or B

1. According to the pertinent statutory provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the grounds for sentencing have been agreed upon, and considering the favorable circumstances in which the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant, the crime of this case shall be considered as being committed in light of the applicable applicable law, and the fact that the defendant runs away during the period of suspended execution, while the crime of this case is committed for the same type of crime, shall be considered as being disadvantageous to the fact that the injured party runs away during the period of suspended execution, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the conditions for sentencing under