Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On July 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, in support of the development of the Suwon method, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 26, 2017.

On June 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:40 on the 316:6th day of Ansan-si, the members of the Home Packer shop, which was displayed in the store by taking advantage of the gaps in which surveillance in the surrounding area was neglected; (b) was placed in a product equivalent to KRW 40,000, including food in an amount of KRW 40,000, including “HDMI slot Cable” and “HDI SP Cables”.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry of criminal history and application of the same criminal records and other statutes of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. According to the reasoning of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, including the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered by considering the following factors.

- Unfavorable circumstances: Cumulative crimes (eight times of the same kind), the circumstances favorable to recidivism and favorable to the judgment in the judgment of the immediately preceding crime: Confession and reflectivity, the victim's penalty not to be punished, and equality in the case of concurrent judgment with the final judgment of the court;