도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing by the prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing has a history of having been punished by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2009 and 2010; (b) the blood alcohol content of the instant case belongs to the high level; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant reflects the Defendant’s wrongness; and (d) other favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, details of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime; and (e) other favorable conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court (the imprisonment for six months, the suspension of execution of two years,
2. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.