피고인은 2020. 3. 4. 00:08경 파주시 B아파트 정문 앞에서 ‘동네 동생이 술을 마시다가 깽판을 친다’라는 취지의 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 파주경찰서 C파출소 소속 경장 D, 경위 E이 피고인과 F의 싸움을 제지하자 갑자기 양손으로 경장 D의 조끼를 잡아 흔든 후 주먹으로 그의 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 이를 말리는 경위 E의 머리채를 잡은 후 다리 부위를 걷어차고, 지원 요청을 받고 현장에 도착한 경위 G의 멱살을 잡아 흔드는 등 폭행하여 경찰공무원들의 112신고사건 처리업무에 관한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to reporting 12 cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing selective sentence of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the range of the recommended sentence] of the obstruction of performance of official duties or the coercion of official duties (the scope of the recommended sentence and the recommended sentence], the basic area of the recommendation [the scope of the recommended sentence], six months to one year and six months;

2. Although the Defendant, who made a decision of sentence, led to the confession of a crime and reflects the wrongness, the Defendant had already been sentenced to the suspension of performance of official duties twice again, but the content and degree of violence used while obstructing the performance of official duties.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the circumstances revealed in the course of investigation and trial, such as the age, social living relationship, etc. of a defendant.