except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:45 on July 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol together with the victim F(F) of E and E, a third village in the direction of ‘Dju' in 13:45, 2013; (b) reported the victim F’s remarks to the above E; and (c) collected f’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and caused the victim’s head to inflict an injury on the victim, whose head requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a case where the defendant saw the defendant as a dangerous object, and inflicted an injury on the victim, and the crime is not less complicated in light of the method and result of the crime.

However, the suspension of execution is to be sentenced through discretionary mitigation of statutory punishment in consideration of various factors of sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and divided the wrong facts, that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, and that the defendant is the primary offender.