A. (1) When Defendant C and D operated an installment financing business with the trade name of “F” and operated the said business, they came to be pressured for repayment of obligations due to unreasonable expansion of business, they came to use the loan borrowed from the financial company as if they were actually purchased a heavy-end automobile, and then came to use it for personal purposes, such as repayment of debts, not for purchase of used cars. On February 7, 2013, Defendant C and D were to build an automobile sales complex, and need to display the vehicle in the said automobile sales complex. If they were to use the vehicle in their name, they would purchase the vehicle with the loan borrowed from capital or loan extended to another person within three months, and would not cause any damage to the Plaintiff by obtaining the loan borrowed from the Defendant’s name, or by obtaining the loan borrowed from the Defendant’s name, with the intention to use the loan borrowed from the Defendant’s name of “B and to use the loan borrowed from KRW 70,000,000,000,000 for more than KRW 3,000.

(2) Defendant C and 2 obtained pecuniary benefits by deceiving Defendant B by obtaining a loan of KRW 35,00,000 as a purchase.