2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

A. The Plaintiff is an enterprise specialized in the construction and management of water pollution prevention facilities. The Defendant supplies kimchi, etc. produced in kimchi factories through its affiliated food business offices to the Ministry of National Defense. Since around 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract for technical management of water pollution prevention facilities with both main food business places, and soon factories, and provided services.

B. In addition, in early 2013, the Plaintiff’s organization and external transactions within the Defendant’s organization of the food business establishment are called “a postponed factory,” but only “a postponed factory” is called “a postponed factory.”

When concluding a service contract for technical management of water pollution prevention facilities, it received 880,000 won at the service cost on the last day of each month and agreed that the cost of repairing the wastewater treatment facilities is borne by the defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant service contract”). The service cost of this case, including the wastewater treatment facility repair cost, has been included in the service cost list below.

(2) On or before December 3, 200, 200 on or before April 201, 201, 200 on or before December 201, 200, 4 "〃 4 on or before July 6, 2013, 5 " 7 on or before September 10, 2013, 0 " 0 " 04 on or before December 2013, 200" 0 " 04 on or before December 5, 2013, 200 " 04 on or before December 16, 2014, 10" 0 " 04 on or before December 20, 2013, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 123538, Mar. 24, 2014>

C. As to the factory assigned to the Plaintiff, the Defendant refers to the following table of performance: